Image

Georgia lawmakers have voted against a proposal to raise the salaries of top elected officials, including Governor Brian Kemp. The controversial measure, which was introduced as an amendment to House Bill 86, sought to increase Kemp’s annual salary from $182,000 to $250,000—a 37% hike that would have made him tied with New York Governor Kathy Hochul as the highest-paid governor in the nation. The proposed raises also included significant salary boosts for other statewide officials, such as the lieutenant governor, attorney general, and secretary of state.
The plan faced swift rejection from the Georgia House, with lawmakers expressing concerns over the timing and implications of such increases. Critics argued that attaching these raises to a judicial pay bill in the final days of the legislative session was inappropriate and lacked thorough consideration. Representative Rob Leverett, the original sponsor of House Bill 86, stated that while discussions about salary adjustments for elected officials are necessary, they should not be rushed as last-minute amendments. The Senate had passed the revised bill earlier in the week but also backed down from its support after the House’s decision.
Proponents of the salary hikes contended that Georgia’s top officials are underpaid compared to their counterparts in other states and even local leaders within Georgia. Senator John Albers pointed out that Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens earns more than Governor Kemp under current pay structures. Supporters argued that the raises would bring salaries in line with private sector standards and ensure uniformity among executive officers. Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones had pledged to donate any raise he received to charity, encouraging other officials to do the same.
Despite these arguments, opposition centered on concerns about public perception and fiscal responsibility. Republican Senator John Kennedy emphasized that legislators must be prepared to justify such raises to taxpayers, highlighting the challenges of asking for additional funds during a period of economic uncertainty. Democratic Senator Kim Jackson expressed reservations about implementing raises before Georgia’s next election cycle, suggesting that such decisions should take effect after voters have had their say.
The debate over salary increases also extended to state legislators, whose pay remains significantly lower than the national average. Some lawmakers argued that low compensation limits political participation to retirees or wealthy individuals who can afford to serve without financial strain. However, others maintained that public service should not be motivated by financial gain and warned against undermining the principle of a citizen legislature.
While pay raises for elected officials were rejected, lawmakers approved increased salaries for Georgia judges under separate legislation. These changes will tie judicial pay to federal judges’ salaries in Georgia’s Northern District, addressing disparities within the judiciary.
The decision to reject salary increases for elected officials reflects broader tensions over balancing fair compensation with fiscal accountability and public trust. As discussions about pay equity continue, Georgia’s leaders face ongoing scrutiny over how best to serve their constituents while addressing disparities in compensation across government roles. For now, Governor Kemp and other officials will remain among the lower-paid leaders compared to their peers nationwide